Post by Jan RasmussenEn bærbar computer er ikke beregnet til så krævende 3d spil,,,
http://www23.tomshardware.com/graphics.html?modelx=33&model1=531&model2=571&chart=224
I ovenstående test har jeg sammenlignet med mit eget grafikkort i min desktop computer , Geforce 7600GS
der score 1118 points til sammenligning med X600's 283 points,
http://www23.tomshardware.com/graphics.html?modelx=33&model1=531&model2=571&chart=204
eller frames i denne.
Det er et mirakel at du overhoved er i stand til at få 8fps på en bærbar,
det må være en kraftig model.
Jan Rasmussen
Ok, når jeg om ikke så længe skal købe en ny stationær, så må jeg finde ud af hvad der skal være inde i den.
Hvad kan foreslåes?
Et godt grafikkort som eks. Geforce 7900GT til omkring kr- 2200,-
http://www.edbpriser.dk/Products/Listprices.asp?ID=197465
Og så ellers en så hurtig CPU som muligt, (flere kerner hjælper ikke
i FSX på nuværende tidspunkt, ser det ud til.)
http://www.simhq.com/_technology2/technology_093a.html
Review: FSX Performance Testing
Conclusions
Without a doubt, FSX is almost 100% constrained in its performance characteristics
by the installed CPU.
Microsoft simply failed to optimize FSX for multi-processing, a curious situation
considering how bottlenecked the title is by a system's CPU and the fact that both
Intel and AMD have had mainstream-priced dual cores on the market for over a year now.
Which leaves us wondering if, and to what degree, optimizations for SMP may be included with the upcoming
Windows Vista / DX10 patch? Time will tell, but until then Flight Simulator fans with mid-range systems will
either stick with the older 2004 version of the series, dial back the graphics options in FSX, or accept the
cost of a processor upgrade for their home system.
Jan Rasmussen